Monday, May 20, 2019

The Energetics of Beach Volleyball: How Collegiate Beach Athletes May Be at Risk for Low Energy Availability

Revised and Updated for 2019

Introduction

The number of women and girls playing sports in school is at an all time high.  Female sport participation in college has steadily grown for decades and now exceeds 216,300 athletes.[1] Increased participation has followed new opportunities for women to compete through sport sponsorship and athletic aid.[2]  As the NCAA's newest sport, beach volleyball is completing its 8th season of competition and its third as a championship sport.  Since being added to the emerging sports list in 2009, the number of beach volleyball teams has grown steadily.  In 2012, there were fifteen Division I teams and 204 players.  By 2018, that number had increased to 68 teams across Divisions I, II and III and 1,165 players total.[3]  As sport sponsorship has grown so has the number of players.[4]  Sponsorship alone, however, is not the only factor driving growth.  Beach volleyball rosters have expanded 25.7% since the sport's first season in 2012.[5]  The average Division I roster size is now 17.3 players compared to 13.6 in the 2011-12 season.

Beach volleyball's growth has expanded access to the extraordinary benefits women and girls derive from athletic participation.[6]  It has also lead to a greater need to understand the unique health concerns of female athletes, including issues related to sex-specific physiology.  As nearly 60% of head coaches for Division I beach volleyball programs are men,[7] exploring the interaction of the demands of beach volleyball and women's health serves an important educational purpose.

In this article we'll explore the unique energy costs of playing beach volleyball to better understand the need for these female athletes to train and fuel properly for long term health and success.

Beach Volleyball - Physical Requirements and Physiological Demands

Beach volleyball is a physically demanding outdoor sport played in all weather conditions.[8]  Game tactics require players to move in multi-directional rapid bursts, across an 8x8 meter court, while explosively performing both vertical and horizontal jumping movements.  The game is played in a best-of-three-sets match format with matches lasting 40-54 minutes depending on the number of sets played.[9]  Sets to 21 points last approximately 18 minutes[10] and consist of about 38 rallies.[11]  A typical rally lasts about 7 seconds[12] during which players will jump on average 2.2 times, either blocking or attacking.[13].  Players compete in several matches over the course of a day and most events are contested over multiple days.[14]  Physiologically, the game actions, tempo, and movement patterns make beach volleyball a game of intermittent high intensity exercise interspersed by frequent periods of brief rest.[15]  At elite levels, players perform at approximately 75% of their maximum heart rate (about 146 bpm) throughout the match.[16]  A third of the match is played in excess of 80% of HRmax.[17]  According to data from Harvard Medical School, playing beach volleyball for 30 minutes burns between 240 and 355 calories, depending on playing weight.[18]

The physical demands of beach volleyball are heightened by the surface on which it is played.  Sand is difficult to maneuver in because it compresses and displaces at the point of contact.[19]  As the surface moves, athletes experience a loss of potential kinetic and elastic energy, which decreases the overall efficiency of movement for the energy being exerted.[20]  Some research has associated performing in sand with an increased load on the lower limb muscles because they work harder to stabilize the body as sand displaces during athletic movement.[21]  As anyone who has gone to the beach knows, there's a sensation of having to exert more effort to move in sand than on a firm surface.  The sand in beach volleyball is also highly unpredictable because it can vary in depth,[22] composition,[23] and temperature[24] from event to event.     

Perceived exertion while moving in sand is also associated with biomechanical adaptations during sand performance.  Research has shown several changes in the way the ankle, knee flexor, and hip joints work during the stride and jump mechanics of beach volleyball when compared to similar actions performed on a rigid surface.[25]  The biomechanical differences in the way the body functions in sand have been associated with a greater energy cost of performance. 

Lastly, there is a higher level of muscle activation and physiological strain associated with exercising on sand compared to a firm surface.[26]  The sand thus imposes an additional physiological component to the demands of beach volleyball above those associated with performing the technical and tactical skills of the game. 

Beach Volleyball - Energy Costs

The energy costs of performing on sand have uniformly been shown to significantly exceed that of performing on a rigid surface.  When compared to firm surface activity, sand imposes a 1.8 to 2.7 times greater energy cost to walking,[27], a 1.2 to 1.6 times greater energy cost to running,[28], and a 1.2 times energy cost to jumping.[29]

The energy cost of sand training means beach volleyball players exert greater energy pursuing the ball and jumping to serve, attack, and block than if they played indoors or on grass.  Beach volleyball thus imposes unique energy demands on its players.  The magnitude of the energy costs depends in part on the amount of sand displacement, which can vary based on the characteristics of the sand, including its granular composition, moisture content, and depth.[30]  This is why beach volleyball players find it easier to jump in shallow and wet sand than in deep and dry sand.  It also explains the difference players feel when they compete on traditionally "hard-packed" beaches, such as on the west coast of Florida, compared to deep sand beaches, such as in Hermosa Beach, California.

In short, beach volleyball athletes expend substantially more energy playing their sport in sand than their athletic counterparts playing on firm surfaces when performing lateral moves, running, diving, and jumping.

As collegiate beach volleyball attracts more women and girls into the sport, and the game itself continues to evolve, the unique physical and energy demands of the game must be understood within the context of the health and physiological needs of its female athletes.

Recent Study - Risk of Low Energy Availability in Beach Volleyball Athletes

In 2017, Gilchrist et al. examined the energy availability and muscle glycogen levels of 18 NCAA Division I beach volleyball players (ages of 19 and 22 years old; weight 63.3 to 68.4 kilograms, and height 174.5 to 180.1 centimeters). 

The authors examined the participants' dietary intake, energy expenditure, and energy availability by evaluating a 7 day food and activity log.  The players' resting metabolic rate (RMR) and muscle glycogen levels were measured before and after practice.  The analysis revealed that 55.6% of the players were not eating enough to meet the caloric needs associated with the RMR.  No players were eating enough carbohydrates, and 94.4% of the athletes were experiencing low energy availability.   Overall, the authors concluded that female collegiate beach volleyball athletes are at risk of experiencing low energy levels.[31] The findings were associated with the players' inadequate dietary habits for the high energy demands of beach volleyball.



Low Energy Availability - Physiological Function and Performance

Low energy availability among female athletes is a significant concern as it can inhibit an athlete's response to training and hinder her performance in competition.  More importantly, low energy can be symptomatic of disordered eating behaviors which, if not diagnosed and treated, can lead to serious long term health consequences.

LEA develops when athletes do not consume enough food to meet their specific energy requirements for training, competing, and normal physiological functioning.[32].  Adequate calorie intake is necessary to maintain lean tissue mass, immune and reproductive function, and optimal athletic performance.[33]  When supply is low the body works to conserve energy through a range of endocrine adaptations that alter its ordinary functioning.[34]  It also begins to burn fat and lean tissue as fuel, a process that decreases muscle mass and impairs strength and endurance.[35]  Female athletes with low energy intake have also been found to consume too few micronutrients and be at risk of experiencing deficiencies in calcium, iron, magnesium, zinc and the B-complex vitamins, among others.[36]  Similar to inadequate caloric intake, micronutrient deficiencies can impair biological functioning and contribute to sub-optimal athletic performance.[37]

Clearly, a beach volleyball player who is consuming less energy than is required to train and perform in her sport is at risk of suffering performance impairments.  For this reason it is essential that beach players' caloric intake be monitored and adjusted to properly fuel their bodies for the energy demands of the sport.[38]  This requires a coordinated effort among sport coaches, sport nutritionists, athletic trainers, and team doctors.  While a number of studies indicate that female athletes are not consuming enough calories to meet their energy demands,[39] to date there is little research on the caloric burn or energy needs of female beach volleyball players in the collegiate game.  The work of Gilchrist and her colleagues is an important contribution to our understanding, and reliable evidence that collegiate beach players may be at risk for low energy availability.

LEA - Female Athlete Triad

The role of collegiate sport coaches is first to support and protect the long term health of athletes in their care.  LEA thus raises concerns that run more deeply than an athlete's impaired athletic performance.  Women and girls who experience low energy may be at risk for a triad of serious health conditions known collectively as the female athlete triad.   

The female athlete triad is a combination of interrelated conditions: (1) low energy availability, with or without disordered eating, (2) menstrual dysfunction, and (3) low bone mineral density.[40]  The triad is considered a spectrum disorder meaning each condition is evaluated on a range from low to higher levels of pathology and any one condition can meet the criteria for diagnosis.[41]  Low energy is widely considered the cornerstone, however, because it creates a risk of developing the other components of the triad.[42]

We've posited that the high energy demands of beach volleyball may contribute to female players' susceptibility for LEA and noted that the latest research supports the view.  In the following section we'll examine whether other aspects of collegiate beach volleyball contribute to the risk of LEA in female athletes. 

LEA in Beach Volleyball

Body Image

While female athletes in any sport can develop low energy availability, some sport settings contribute to a greater prevalence of the condition.  Studies have shown that athletes who perceive pressure to appear lean are more susceptible to the female athlete triad.[43]  Beach volleyball has not traditionally been considered a lean-athlete sport in the category of dancing, gymnastics, running, and diving.  However, the beach culture of the sport, in which participants traditionally have competed in bikinis, should not be ignored in a search for risk factors particularly in light of evidence that many female athletes report concern with the weight and shape of their body.[44]  As the sport has become more professionalized uniform requirements have prohibited (college) and no longer require (international and Olympic) bikinis.  The restrictions do not, however, apply to junior girls or collegiate players training outside of their school season.  The drive in some female athletes to improve their body image on the beach could be considered a risk factor in beach volleyball.[45]  

Time Demands - Eating Disruptions

As LEA is related directly to energy intake, collegiate beach volleyball athletes who skip meals to meet academic or training schedules (or simply to get more sleep) could be at risk of expending more energy than they are consuming.  Time demands on collegiate athletes are intensive and may disrupt optimal eating patterns and choices.[46]  The understanding of this risk for collegiate athletes suggests that it may be beneficial to monitor nutritional intake and educate players in time management skills that can mitigate the adverse impact of time demands on beach volleyball athletes' energy levels.

Dual Sport Athletes

As many as 50% of Division I beach volleyball players are dual sport athletes who train and compete both for their school's indoor and beach teams.[47]  Collegiate beach volleyball is thus unique in the high prevalence of athletes who have no official off-season and who may train and compete under different coaching and support staffs.  As the two sports impose distinct energy demands on players, and the continuous nature of training in-season adds hours of additional training time to players schedules, the dual sport status of many players raises a substantial risk that energy consumption may be inadequate to meet energy demands.

Sport coaches with dual sport athletes should implement energy and nutrition monitoring protocols to ensure female athletes are not at risk of developing low energy stores.  The services of a sports dietitian educated in the unique energy requirements and physiological demands of beach volleyball should also be made available to players as education has been shown to improve nutritional intake and knowledge in collegiate volleyball players.[48]

Conclusion

The presence of LEA in female beach players is particularly concerning given the unique energy demands of the sport and current diagnostic guidelines.  Low energy alone could meet the criteria for diagnosis of the female athlete triad and certainly should trigger further evaluation and monitoring.  Sport coaches should thus be educated in the risks of LEA, skilled in identifying symptoms, and prepared to seek professional assistance from outside the staff.  Identification and treatment requires a multidisciplinary, coordinated approach as early intervention and treatment are essential to the avoidance of long term health consequences for female beach volleyball players.[49]

Acknowledgement

I am grateful to Mary Mulcahey, M.D., Director of the Women's Sports Medicine Program & Associate Professor in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Tulane University, for reviewing an earlier draft of this article and providing invaluable editorial assistance.

References

[1]  National Collegiate Athletic Association. 1982-2018 NCAA Sports Sponsorship and Participation Report. Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association; 2018.  Sports Sponsorship, Participation and Demographics Search [Data file]. Retrieved from http://web1.ncaa.org/rgdSearch/exec/main.  Participation rates are only for female athletes enrolled in NCAA member institutions and participating in sports for which the NCAA conducts championships.  Participation and sport sponsorship data used throughout this article is through the 2017-18 academic year and as of October 2018.

[2]  In 2016-17, there were 149 women's team added at NCAA institutions and 87 women's teams dropped, making it a slow year of growth for women's sports.  Since 1988-89, more than 5,536 women's teams were added to NCAA athletic programs, resulting in a net gain of 3,386 teams after adjusting for changes in sports sponsorship.  The average net gain for women's sports teams over the last 18 years is 188.3 teams per year.  Compared to 1981-82 (when the detailed records began), the average NCAA campus has approximately 96 more female athletes.  National Collegiate Athletic Association.  1982-2017 NCAA Sports Sponsorship and Participation Report. Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association; 2018.  Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 requires that scholarship dollars be spent proportional to participation.  20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq.; 34 C.F.R. § 106.37(c).

[3] National Collegiate Athletic Association. 1982-2018 NCAA Sports Sponsorship and Participation Report. Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association; 2018 (68 teams).  NCAA Sports Sponsorship and Participation Rates Database [Data file].  Retrieved from http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/ncaa-sports-sponsorship-and-participation-rates-database (68 teams).  Participation rates are limited to female athletes enrolled in NCAA member institutions.  As many as 392 additional women compete on 32 NAIA and junior college beach volleyball teams.  American Volleyball Coaches Association.  College Beach Volleyball By the Numbers.  Lexington, KY: American Volleyball Coaches Association; July 2017.  Retrieved from https://www.avca.org/res/uploads/media/CollegeBeachVB-ByTheNumbers-6-17-.pdf.

[4]  According to the American Volleyball Coaches Association (AVCA), 50% of Division I rosters are comprised of dual sport athletes - athletes who play both indoor and beach volleyball.  American Volleyball Coaches Association.  2017 AVCA College Beach Volleyball Survey Results - 64 Teams.  Lexington, KY: American Volleyball Coaches Association; June 22, 2017.  Sport sponsorship therefore provides new collegiate participation opportunities to approximately 50% of the female athletes on beach volleyball rosters and new sport participation opportunities to 100% of those athletes. 

[5]  Compare the average roster size of 13.6 in 2011-12 (15 D-I teams and 204 players) to the average roster size of 17.1 in 2017-18 across all Divisions (68 teams and 1165 players).

[6]  Girls who participate in organized sports have a more positive self image and are at lower risk for teen pregnancy, substance abuse, suicide, and depression.  Sports participation by young girls also positively correlates with improved academic achievement in math and science.  Staurowsky, E.J., DeSousa, M.J., Miller, K.E, Sabo, D., Shakib, S., Theberge, N., Veliz, P., Weaver, A. & Williams, N. (2015).  Her life depends on it III: Sport, physical activity and the health and well being of American girls and women.  East Meadow, NY: Women's Sports Foundation.

[7]  Independent survey of NCAA D-I beach volleyball coaching staffs conducted by Shane Spellman, Director of Beach Volleyball, Grit Volleyball Club.

[8]  See, e.g., Ulmer, A., "Beach Volleyball: It Even Rains on Copacobana."  10 Aug. 2016, www.reuters.com/article/us-olympics-rio-bvolleyball-weather/beach-volleyball-it-even-rains-on-copacabana-idUSKCN10L24Q (describing rainy, windy, and cold conditions during beach volleyball events of 2016 Summer Olympic Games in Rio); Robertson, L., "No matter the weather in London, beach volleyball goes on."  31 July 2012, http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/article1941619.html (describing rainy, cold conditions during beach volleyball events of 2012 Summer Olympic Games in London); Martin, D.E. (1998).  Measurement of climatic heat stress at outdoor venues for endurance events at the Atlanta Olympic Games, 1996.  Sports Medicine Training & Rehabilitation, 8 (4), 321-46 (describing relationship between temperature and beach volleyball players' health and performance during 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta).

[9]  Hayrinen, M., & Tampouratzis, K. (2012).  Technical and tactical game analysis of elite female beach volleyball.  KIHU Research Institute for Olympic Sports Pub. No. 37, 10.  Two set matches averaged 39 minutes 42 seconds.  Three set matches averaged  53 minutes 41 seconds.

[10]  Hayrinen, M., & Tampouratzis, K. (2012).  Technical and tactical game analysis of elite female beach volleyball.  KIHU Research Institute for Olympic Sports Pub. No. 37, 10.  Set duration for 15 point third sets averaged 14 minutes 24 seconds.  Id. We've chosen to include data only from the women's game as the physical demands of women's beach volleyball are more relevant to the issue under discussion than the different requirements of the men's game.

[11]  Hayrinen, M., & Tampouratzis, K. (2012).  Technical and tactical game analysis of elite female beach volleyball.  KIHU Research Institute for Olympic Sports Pub. No. 37, 10.

[12]  Palao, J.M., Lopez-Martinez, A.B. & Ortega, E.  (2015).  Physical actions and work-rest time in women's beach volleyball, International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 15, 424-429 (mean rally length of 6.46 during 2008 Olympic Games); Hayrinen, M., & Tampouratzis, K. (2012).  Technical and tactical game analysis of elite female beach volleyball.  KIHU Research Institute for Olympic Sports Pub. No. 37, 10 (average rally length of 6.9 seconds in FIVB World Tour and European Championships).

[13]  Palao, J.M., Lopez-Martinez, A.B. & Ortega, E.  (2015).  Physical actions and work-rest time in women's beach volleyball, International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 15, 424-429.  Jumping requirements are slightly higher for blockers than defenders.

[14]  Collegiate and domestic professional beach volleyball events are most commonly contested over two (2) days.  International events are played over a period of 2-3 days (excluding the qualifier event preceding the main draw competition).  The Olympic beach volleyball tournaments for each gender are contested over a period of two (2) weeks.

[15]  Magalhaes, J., Inacio, M., Oliveira, E., Ribeiro, J.C. & Ascensao, A. (2011).  Physiological and neuromuscular impact of beach-volleyball with reference to fatigue and recovery.  Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 51, 66-73.

[16]  Magalhaes, J., Inacio, M., Oliveira, E., Ribeiro, J.C. & Ascensao, A. (2011).  Physiological and neuromuscular impact of beach-volleyball with reference to fatigue and recovery.  Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 51, 66-73 (approximately 75% - male players); Jimenez-Olmedo, J.M., Pueo, B, Penichet-Tomas, A., Chinchilla-Mira., J.J. & Perez-Turpin, J.A. (2017).  Physiological work areas in professional beach volleyball: a case study.  Retos: Federacion Espanola de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educacion Fisica (FEADEF), 31, 94-97  (players' median max heart rate between 71.71% and 84.78%).

[17]  Magalhaes, J., Inacio, M., Oliveira, E., Ribeiro, J.C. & Ascensao, A. (2011).  Physiological and neuromuscular impact of beach-volleyball with reference to fatigue and recovery.  Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 51, 66-73.

[18]  "Calories burned in 30 minutes for people of three different weights."  Harvard Health Publishing, 2004, July.  (Updated, 17 March 2017), www.health.harvard.edu/diet-and-weight-loss/calories-burned-in-30-minutes-of-leisure-and-routine-activities.

[19]  Binnie, M.J., Dawson, B., Pinnington, H., Landers, G. & Peeling, P.  (2004). Effect of sand versus grass training surfaces during an 8-week pre-season conditioning programme in team sports athletes.  Journal of Sports Science, 32(11), 1001-1012 (overcoming the lack of initial fixed resistance in sand requires greater exertion of effort and expenditure of energy).

[20]  Gaudino, P., Gaudino, C., Alberti, G., & Minetti., A. (2013).  Biomechanics and predicted energetics of sprinting on sand: Hints for soccer training.  Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 16, 271-275; Zamparo, P., Perini, R., Orizio, C., Sacher, M., & Ferretti, G., (1992).  The energy cost of walking or running on sand.  European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 65(2), 183-187.  See Lejeune, T.M., Williams, P.A., Heglund, N.C. (1998).  Mechanics and energetics of human locomotion on sand.  Journal of Experimental Biology. 201(Pt 13), 2071-2080.

[21]  Zamparo, P., Perini, R., Orizio, C., Sacher, M., & Ferretti, G., (1992).  The energy cost of walking or running on sand.  European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 65(2), 183-187; Lejeune, T.M., Williams, P.A., Heglund, N.C. (1998).  Mechanics and energetics of human locomotion on sand.  Journal of Experimental Biology. 201(Pt 13), 2071-2080.

[22]  Sand must be at least 40 centimeters deep and comprised of fine, loosely compacted grains for international competition.  Federation Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB), Official Beach Volleyball Rules, Rule 1.2.2 (2001-2020); USA Volleyball Beach Domestic Competition Regulations, Rule 1.2.2 (2015-17).  Maximum depth is unregulated.

[23]  The sand should be "levelled . . . as flat and uniform as possible" on a playing surface "free of rocks, shells and anything else, which can represent risks of cuts or injuries to the players."   Federation Internationale de Volleyball (FIVB), Official Beach Volleyball Rules, Rule 1.2.1 (2001-2020);  USA Volleyball Beach Domestic Competition Regulations, Rule 1.2.2 (2015-17).

[24]  The sand reportedly reached 107 degrees (F) during the 2004 Summer Olympic Games (Athens, Greece).  "Sand Reaches 107 Degrees."  ESPN, 22 Aug. 2004, http://www.espn.com/olympics/summer04/volleyball/news/story?id=1864959.

[25]  Giatsis, G., Panoutsakopoulos & Kollias, I.  (2017).  Biomechanical differences of arm swing countermovement jumps on sand and rigid surface performed by elite beach volleyball players.  Journal of Sports Sciences, 36, 997-1008 (compliance of sand adversely impacts coordination of lower limb joints);  Giatsis, G., Kollias, I., Panoutsakopoulos, V. & Papaiakovou, G.  (2007).  Biomechanical differences in elite beach volleyball players in vertical squat jump on rigid and sand surface.  Sports Biomechanics, 3, 145-158; Pinnington, H.C., Lloyd, D.G., Beiser, T.F. & Dawson, B.  (2005).  Kinematic and electromyography analysis of submaximal differences running on a firm surface compared with soft, dry sand.  European Journal of Applied Physiology, 94, 242-253 (greater hip and knee flexion angles observed while running on sand); see also Muramatsu, S., Fukudome, A., Miyama, M., Arimoto, M., & Kijima, A. (2006). Energy expenditure in maximal jumps on sand.  Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 25(1), 59-61 (decreased efficiency in coordinating body segments to jump in sand could be associated with greater energy expenditure).

[26]  Pinnington, H.C., Lloyd, D.G., Beiser, T.F. & Dawson, B.  (2005).  Kinematic and electromyography analysis of submaximal differences running on a firm surface compared with soft, dry sand.  European Journal of Applied Physiology, 94, 242-253.

[27]  Lejeune, T.M., Williams, P.A., Heglund, N.C.. (1998).  Mechanics and energetics of human locomotion on sand.  Journal of Experimental Biology. 201(Pt 13), 2071-2080;  Zamparo, P., Perini, R., Orizio, C., Sacher, M., & Ferretti, G., (1992).  The energy cost of walking or running on sand.  European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 65(2), 183-187.

[28]  Gaudino, P., Gaudino, C., Alberti, G., & Minetti., A. (2013).  Biomechanics and predicted energetics of sprinting on sand: Hints for soccer training.  Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 16, 271-275; Pinnington, H.C. & Dawson, B. (2001).  Running economy of elite surf iron men and male runners on soft dry beach sand and grass.  European Journal of Applied Physiology, 86, 62-70; Pinnington, H.C. & Dawson, B. (2001).  The energy cost of running on grass compared to soft dry sand.  Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 4(4), 416-430; Lejeune, T.M., Williams, P.A., Heglund, N.C.. (1998).  Mechanics and energetics of human locomotion on sand.  Journal of Experimental Biology. 201(Pt 13), 2071-2080; Zamparo, P., Perini, R., Orizio, C., Sacher, M., & Ferretti, G., (1992).  The energy cost of walking or running on sand.  European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 65(2), 183-187.

[29]  Muramatsu, S., Fukudome, A., Miyama, M., Arimoto, M., & Kijima, A. (2006). Energy expenditure in maximal jumps on sand.  Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 25(1), 59-61.

[30]  Pinnington, H.C. & Dawson, B. (2001).  Running economy of elite surf iron men and male runners on soft dry beach sand and grass.  European Journal of Applied Physiology, 86, 62-70.

[31]  Gilchrist, M., Torres-McGehee, T., Minori, M., Emerson, D., & Pritchett, K. (2017).  Energy Availability and Muscle Glycogen Levels in Division I Beach Volleyball Athletes.  Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 49(5S) Supplement I, 13-14.  Previous research focused only on indoor volleyball.  Woodruff, S.J. & Meloche, R.D. (2013).  Energy Availability of Female Varsity Volleyball Players.  International Journal of Sports Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 23, 24-30.

[32]  There is some evidence that female athletes' energy needs increase above normal levels for her physical activity during the luteal (premenstrual) phase of the menstrual cycle.  Thomas, D.T., Erdman, K.A. & Burke, L.M. (2016).  Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics, dietitians of Canada, and the American college of sports medicine: Nutrition and athletic performance.  Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(3), 501-528 (citing Manore, M. & Thompson, J., Energy requirements of the athlete: Assessment and evidence of energy efficiency. in: L. Burke, V. Deakin (Eds.) Clinical Sports Nutrition. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, Sydney-Australia: 2015, 114-139.).

[33]  American College of Sports Medicine, American Dietetic Association; Dietitians of Canada. Joint Position Statement: Nutrition and Athletic Performance.  Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2000, 32, 2130-2145.

[34]  Female Recreational Exercisers At Risk For Low Energy Availability, Slater, J, McLay-Cook, R., Brown, R. & Black, K. (2016).  International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise, 26(5), 421-427.

[35]  American College of Sports Medicine, American Dietetic Association; Dietitians of Canada. Joint Position Statement: Nutrition and Athletic Performance.  Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2000, 32, 2130-2145.

[36] Thomas, D.T., Erdman, K.A., Burke, L.M. (2016). Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics, dietitians of Canada, and the American college of sports medicine: Nutrition and athletic performance. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(3), 501-528;  Silva, M-R.G. & Paiva, T. (2014).  Low energy availability and low body fat of female gymnasts before an international competition. Applied Sport Sciences, 15(7), 591-599.

[37] Lukaski, H.C., Vitamin and mineral status: Effects on physical performance. (2004).  Nutrition, 20 (7-8), 632-644.

[38]  Monitoring athletes' energy intake may be particularly effective as there is evidence that athletes with low energy availability do not experience increased appetite.  Hubert, P., King, N.A., Blundell, J.E. (1998).  Uncoupling the effects of energy expenditure and energy intake: Appetite response to short-term energy deficit induced by meal omission and physical activity.  Appetite, 31(1), 9-19.

[39] Shriver, L.H., Betts, N.M., Wollenberg, G.  (2015).  Dietary Intakes and Eating Habits of College Athletes: Are Female College Athletes Following the Current Sports Nutrition Standards?  Journal of American College Health, 61, 10-16 (75% of participants not consuming enough carbs to minimally support energy for training); Hoogenboom, B., Morris, J., Morris, C., Schaefer, K. (2009). Nutritional knowledge and eating behaviors of female, collegiate swimmers.  North American Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 4, 139-148.

[40]  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Adolescent Healthcare. Committee Opinion 702: Female Athlete Triad. Obstetrician Gynecologist, 2017, 129(6), e160-e167; Nattiv, A., Loucks, A.B., Mannore, M.M., Sanborn, C.F., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Warren, M.P.  (2007).  American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand.  The female athlete triad, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 39(10), 1867-1882.

[41]  DeSousa, M.J., Nattiv, A., Joy, E. et al. (2014). Female Athlete Triad Coalition Consensus Statement on Treatment and Return to Play of the Female Athlete Triad: First International Conference held in San Francisco, California, May 2012 and Second International Conference held in Indianapolis, Indiana, May 2013.  British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(4), 289.

[42]  Nattiv, A., Loucks, A.B., Mannore, M.M., Sanborn, C.F., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Warren, M.P.  (2007).  American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand.  The female athlete triad, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 39(10), 1867-1882.  The International Olympic Committee proposed renaming the triad the "relative energy deficiency in sport" or "RED-S."  Mountjoy, M., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Burke, L., Carter, S., Constantini, N., Lebrun, C., et al. (2014).  The IOC consensus statement: beyond the Female Athlete Triad--Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S). British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(7), 491-497.

[43]  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Adolescent Healthcare. Committee Opinion 702: Female Athlete Triad. Obstetrician Gynecologist, 2017, 129(6), e160-e167.  Reinking, M.F., Alexander, L.E. (2005). Prevalence of disordered-eating behaviors in undergraduate female collegiate athletes and nonathletes.  Journal of Athletic Training, 40(1), 47-51.

[44]  Frederic, D.A., Peplau, L.A., Lever, J. (2006).  The swimsuit issues: Correlates of body image in a sample of 52,677 heterosexual adults.  Body Image, 3, 413-419.

[45]  Koidou, E., Papadopoulou, S., Thoma, F., Euaggelinou, C. (2016).  Body dissatisfaction and body image of female athletes with normal body weight.  Clinical Nutrition EPEN, 13, e63; Bucchianeri, M.M., Arikian, A.J., Hannan, P.J., Eisenberg, M.E., Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2013).  Body dissatisfaction from adolescence to young adulthood: Findings from a 10-year longitudinal study.  Body Image, 10(1), 1-7.

[46]  Quatromoni, P.A., Clinical observations from nutritional services in college athletics.  (2008).  Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108(4), 689-694.

[47]  American Volleyball Coaches Association.  2017 AVCA College Beach Volleyball Survey Results - 64 Teams.  Lexington, KY: American Volleyball Coaches Association; June 22, 2017.

[48]  Vallient, M.W, Emplaincourt, H.P., Wenzel, R.K. & Garner, B.H. (2012).  Nutrition education by a registered dietitian improves dietary intake and nutrition knowledge of a NCAA female volleyball team.  Nutrients, 4(6), 506-516.

[49]  Screening incoming and returning athletes for low energy availability could be an important intervention by NCAA member institutions.  Logue, D.M., Madigan, S.M., Heinen, M., McDonnell, SJ, Delahunt, E. & Corish, C.A. (2018). Screening for risk of low energy availability in athletic and recreationally active females in Ireland.  European J. Sports Science, 19(1), 112-122.

Thursday, December 17, 2015

Fuel Inject Your Practice Plan Through the Art and Science of Motivation

The American Volleyball Coaches Association (AVCA) recently determined that collegiate beach volleyball has a smaller percentage of its season devoted to competition than any other NCAA Division I women's sport.  In a 22 week season only 8 are allowed for competition with the remainder reserved solely for practice and conditioning.  In many programs, players start training in late August but don't compete until early March.  That's a lot of training, a lot of waiting, and a lot of opportunity for motivation to wane.

So that got me thinking, what is the coaches' role in sparking motivation and why should we care about it all?  Given evidence that motivation can be as important to performance than intelligence, ability, and even financial reward, better understanding the puzzle of motivation may drive us to become better for and to our players.

In the following sections we'll take a look at some principles of motivation culled from scientific research and explore some methods for bringing those principles to practice.

Progress

Progress in Principle

Nothing sparks motivation like progress.  Of all the events that can spark a person's drive to perform, the single most important is making progress in meaningful work, says Teresa Amabile, whose work on motivation in the workplace appears in her insightful book, The Progress Principle.

According to Amabile, a consistent amount of even minor success is more frequently associated with high motivation than any other workday event.  People, it seems, have their best days when they feel like they accomplish something, even if its not a major breakthrough.  In fact, just movement in the right direction can be enough to boost people's emotions and perception of the work.  "When people sense they're making headway, their drive to succeed is at its peak," she says.  The "power of small wins" can make all the difference in how people feel and perform.


Figure I. 

So if this all seems obvious to you (of course people are more motivated when they're doing well) then you're ahead of the many managers Amabile studied. Not only did she find that companies made little effort to enable progress in the workplace, when asked to rank factors that might inspire motivation, managers ranked "progress" dead last.

It seems that the power of progress is both great and overlooked.

The exciting news is that, like workplace managers, we coaches have a wonderful opportunity to facilitate progress in how we choose to interact with our teams.  We must creatively work everyday to ensure we're shaping an environment in which progress can be identified, enjoyed and celebrated.  Opportunities for meaningful accomplishment must be woven into our daily routines.  That's where the art of coaching comes into play.

Progress in Practice

There are a lot of things we can do in practice to nurture progress.  Among them, let players know why they're doing what they’re doing.  If it’s a drill – why that activity?  If its game – why that scoring system?  Tell everyone what the goal is and make it challenging and attainable.  Have a back-up way to measure progress even if a goal is not attained.  Was performance closer than yesterday, last week, last month?  Track performance from day to day, week to week, even year to year.  Keep data and review it periodically for opportunities to show improvement.  Day to day a player may feel like she hasn’t changed.  Show her results trending over a few months and it’s a great visual image of what she’s becoming.  Movement in the right direction is a powerful catalyst.  Videotape performance as much as possible.  It’s an investment worth making for many reasons, not the least of which is you never know when archived footage can be a great motivator.  Show a player who thinks she’s in a rut what she looked like a year ago – she’ll see progress and be energized from the experience.

Setbacks

If progress is the best motivator, setbacks can have the opposite effect.  Some research suggests that setbacks can be even more negative than progress is positive in its impact on motivational drive.  For this reason coaches should plan carefully what we ask of our players.  Think carefully what goals we set and activities we design.  Work with players to customize how we challenge them, and perhaps most of all be cognizant of how outside influences have colored the day.  Our players have busy lives and may suffer setbacks before they even get to practice from home, work or class.  The design of practice should include ways to neutralize those setbacks and allow some meaningful progress to fuel their motivational fire.

In addition to neutralizing setbacks we need to help change how setbacks are viewed.  Experiencing and dealing with setbacks is an essential part of the learning process, it's how we characterize them that matters.  We can minimize the impact of setbacks by emphasizing the good in them.  Perhaps nowhere is this more possible than in our approach to mistakes.  By encouraging experimental error and facilitating improvement through mistakes we can lead our players to a mindset of growth and awaken their senses to what is possible.

[This is Part I of a two part series.  In Part II, we'll continue to look at motivation from the standpoint of autonomy and purpose and discuss ways to incorporate those elements into our practices as well.

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Examining the Impact of an Attacker's Handedness on Anticipatory Judgments in Volleyball

Introduction

An athlete's left-handedness has a distinctly negative impact on an opponents' perceptual judgments.  This perceptual challenge leads lefties to a distinct advantage in interactive sports.[1]  In particular, left-handers' movements are more difficult to anticipate than those of their right-handed counterparts and the condition appears across a variety of sports including, soccer, volleyball, and tennis.[2]

Why are Lefties Harder to Read?

In the search for why, the emerging consensus is that athletes are under-exposed to left-handers and thus possess a greater lack of perceptual familiarity with their sport-specific movements.  Since the skill of anticipation depends heavily on accurately assessing the kinematic cues of opponents, less exposure to those cues equates to less opportunities to learn and a resulting disadvantage in reading performance.[3]  In other words, skilled perceptual judgment is attuned to more frequently encountered actions.  Indeed, this principle has lead one research group to observe, "[i]n volleyball players, the repetitive confrontation primarily with right-handed opponents in practice and competition is likely to explain better performance against right-handers.[4]

So this takes us to left-handedness in volleyball.  If lefties do have an advantage, how far does it extend into the sport and can the advantage be neutralized?  These issues and others have important implications for coaching professionals teaching tactical decisions, designing practice environments, and recruiting athletes to their programs.

Original Research - Anticipation of Shot Direction

As previously reported in an earlier post (Reading Revisited: The Challenge of Reading Left-Handers in Volleyball) (available here), researchers in 2012 sought to determine whether left-handed opponents were more difficult to read when attacking a volleyball by asking groups of skilled and novice players to predict the shot directions of left- and right-handed attacks in a video-based anticipation test.  Participants in both groups were better at predicting the directional outcome of  right-handed compared to left-handed attacks, with skilled players outperforming novices overall.[5]

If the left-handers' shot direction proved more difficult to predict than that of the right-handed players, would the handedness effect also extend to reading the lefties' choice of attack type?  Recent findings provide evidence that it does.

Recent Research - Anticipation of Shot Selection

A study published in Human Movement Science examined whether opponents shown video of an attack sequence could predict the type of attack ("smash" or "lob") planned by left- and right-handers with equivalent accuracy.[6]

Methods and Procedure

A total of 48 skilled volleyball players and novices participated by watching videos of left- and right-handed attacks on a computer screen. The videos were filmed from the perspective of a defensive player in either zones 1 or 5 of a volleyball court.  Each sequence included a reception/pass and a set to an attacker.  Attackers performed either hard or soft shots - "smashes" or lobs."  Videos lasted three seconds each and were temporally occluded to stop at the moment the attacker contacted the ball.

Further, to test whether prediction accuracy varied according to time in the sequence,each attack was occluded at six different time points relative to the moment of hand-to-ball contact: (a) 600 ms prior to contact, (b) 480 ms prior to contact, (c) 360 ms prior to contact, (d) 240 ms prior to contact, (e) 120 ms prior to contact and (f) at contact with the ball.  After the end of each video participants indicated whether they thought the attacker would perform a "smash" or a "lob."  There was not time limit for making the decision. 

Findings

Consistent with previous findings, skilled players outperformed novices in correctly anticipating the type of attack but left-handed attacks were harder to predict than right-handed attacks.  "A main effect for attackers' hand provided support for the notion that right-handed actions are easier to anticipate than left-handed actions.  Thus, an opponent's handedness seem to not only affect visual anticipation of outcome direction, but also the prediction of the type of an action (here, smash vs. lob in volleyball attacks)."[7]  Lefties, it seems are far more difficult to predict whether hitting or shooting the ball and regardless of the direction of their attack.

The question still remains as to why.  If it's simply the case that volleyball players train and compete against righties more than lefties and so are better attuned to the right-hander's movements why did both the experienced and inexperienced players underperform in predicting left-handed attacks?  Certainly the novices were not relying on their years of experience in the game against right-handers.[8]  The authors themselves acknowledge that the finding "appears unexpected" given the lack of competitive experience for the novices and posit that the novices' recreational exposure to volleyball likely over-exposed them to right-handed actions and that imbalanced experience provoked the handedness effect in the study.  

Clearly, its a question awaiting further study and one that is essential to our understanding of how best to train our volleyball athletes to neutralize the "lefty advantage."

Training Implications

Armed with knowledge that left-handers are more difficult to read what can we coaches do to improve our athletes' performances? Regardless of the need for more study it seems enticing to think that exposing our athletes more often to lefties in practice will increase opportunities to learn from their presence.  It's a practice fairly common in professional tennis with at least some anecdotal evidence to support it,[9] but no reported data supporting either short- or long-term improvement resulting from the practice.  It is also worth noting that tennis professionals seem to seek out lefty training opponents more to practice standard tactical adjustments against them and less to refine visual perceptual acumen.

On the experimental side, there is some evidence to support the notion that increased visual exposure to left-handed movements can reduce the effect of the left-hander's advantage.  In research published in the Journal of Sports Sciences, for example, a video-based perceptual training program was shown to improve the performance of participants predicting the directional outcome of left-handed penalty shots in handball.[10]  It thus seems plausible that a coaching manipulation of the training environment to increase the prevalence of left-handed opponents in volleyball is a potentially fruitful avenue of performance enhancement.


NOTES

[1] We address here an only "advantage" resulting specifically from being less predictable and not from the tactical preferences of opponents.  See Loffing, F., Hagemann, N., & Strauss, B. (2010).  Automated processes in tennis: Do left-handed players benefit from the tactical preferences of their opponents?  Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 435-443.  See also, Sampras, P., (1998). Don't let southpaws scare you: After losing some tough matches to left-handers, I've learned how to handle them.  Tennis, 34, 142-45 (discussing tactical advantages for left-handed tennis players resulting from tennis scoring system).

[2] McMorris, T., & Colenso, S. (1996). Anticipation of professional soccer goalkeepers when facing right- and left-footed penalty kicks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 931–934.  Loffing, F., Schorer, J., Hagemann, N., Baker, J., (2012).  On the advantage of being left-handed in volleyball: further evidence of the specificity of skilled visual perception.  Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 446-453Hagemann N (2009) The advantage of being left-handed in interactive sports. Atten Percept Psycho 71: 1641–1648 (tennis stroke).

[3] Urgesi, C., Savonitto, M. M., Fabbro, F., & Aglioti, S. M. (2012). Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.  Psychological Research, 76, 542-560.

[4]  Loffing, F., Hagemann, N., Schorer, J., & Baker, J. (2015).  Skilled players' and novices' difficulty anticipating left- vs. right-handed opponents' action intentions varies across different points in time. Human Movement Science, 40, 410-21, 417.

[5]  Loffing, F., Schorer, J., Hagemann, N., Baker, J., (2012).  On the advantage of being left-handed in volleyball: further evidence of the specificity of skilled visual perception.  Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 446-453.

[6]  Loffing, F., Hagemann, N., Schorer, J., & Baker, J. (2015).  Skilled players' and novices' difficulty anticipating left- vs. right-handed opponents' action intentions varies across different points in time. Human Movement Science, 40, 410-21, 417.

[7]  Loffing, F., Hagemann, N., Schorer, J., & Baker, J. (2015).  Skilled players' and novices' difficulty anticipating left- vs. right-handed opponents' action intentions varies across different points in time. Human Movement Science, 40, 410-21, 417.

[8]  The novice participant group was comprised of 18 males and 8 females with a collective mean age of 24.77 years and "no experience in competitive volleyball or beach volleyball."  The authors acknowledge that the handedness-dependent performance differences in novices "appears unexpected." 

[9]  Sampras, P., (1998). Don't let southpaws scare you: After losing some tough matches to left-handers, I've learned how to handle them.  Tennis, 34, 142-45 (discussing tactical advantages for left-handed tennis players resulting from tennis scoring system and noting common practice to train against left-handers in advance of matches).  See also Crouse, K. (2011).  Left-Handers Have Edge in Slice and Singularity.  N.Y. Times (June 26, 2011), available at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/27/sports/tennis/2011-wimbledon-left-handers-have-benefit-of-slice-and-singularity.html?_r=0 (noting practice of training against left-handers in advance of matches to be played against lefty opponents).

[10]  Loffing, F., Schorer, J., Hagemann, N., Baker, J., (2012).  Human handedness in interactive situations: Negative perceptual frequency effects can be reversed!  Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 446-453.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Research Suggests Age Group and Player Role Effects on Physical Demands of Beach Volleyball Players

From the Journal of Sports Science and Medicine comes new research aimed at analyzing the physical and temporal characteristics of U19, U21 and senior beach volleyball players in light of players' roles as blockers and defenders and considering the quality of opposition. 

Temporal variables included duration of set, total rest time, total work time, duration of rallies and rest time between rallies.  Physical variables included the number of jumps and number of attacks by role.

Interested readers may access the full text of the article here.

Monday, November 4, 2013

The Impact of Deception and Disguise on the Skill of Anticipation in Beach Volleyball

The skill of anticipation is an important component of expertise in sports.  The delay occasioned by our perceptual system while processing information means athletes in fast-moving sports need to make advance[1] predictive judgments in order to prepare and execute appropriate motor responses to their opponent's tactics.[2] 

The dynamics of beach volleyball and the conditions in which it is played make early reads and motoric preparation essential if an athlete is to have success.  The speed at which the ball is attacked,[3] the size of the area to be defended,[4] and conditions that impair players' vision[5], slow their foot-speed[6], and heavily tax their energy systems,[7] combine to place a premium on the ability to predict behavior from the earliest onset of movement.  Anticipation under pressure is one of the premier skills distinguishing elite from novice beach volleyball athletes.

Perceptual Motor Skills

One of the ways skilled athletes are able to make correct predictions is through advance cue utilization -- a process of using information from an opponent’s bodily movements to anticipate what she is likely to do.[8]  An attacking hand behind the head, a slowed approach, an un-raised elbow, even a blocker's stance, can have meaning to an experienced opponent and betray the intent of the athlete whose conduct is on display.
 
As it turns out, skilled athletes regularly outperform novices in anticipating developing actions because skilled athletes are better at utilizing information gleaned from their opponents.[9]  And it's not that elite performers have superior vision or even advanced reaction times that explain their predictive abilities.[10]  Rather, experts make better predictions because they’re able to draw more meaning from the body kinematics of other players in the game.[11]. 
 
So if experts are better at reading the cues of others players does that advantage extend to discriminating opponent's deceptive intentions?

Despite the ubiquity of deception in sports, and its primacy as a tactic in beach volleyball, the impact of deception on the anticipatory skills of advanced athletes has only recently garnered scientific attention. 
 
Deception in Sports

Athletes regularly use deceptive movement for competitive advantage.  Tactical deception takes two basic forms – attempts made by players to hide information (disguise) and attempts made by players to offer false information (deception).[12] The former is used to delay an opponent’s decision by hiding cues of the actor’s intent.  The latter is aimed at providing deliberately false cues to induce an erroneous response.

The Art of Deception in Beach Volleyball

If deception is prevalent in sports it is everywhere on the beach.  Blockers lean one way and dive another; defenders feign covering the cross-court and run to the line; and attackers deliberately approach one direction and then hit the other way.  Even an early position in serve receive can be a ploy to induce a desired serve location.  Beach volleyball players regularly use their bodies as instruments of deception by feigning their intent through deliberately false cues.[13]

So all of this tactical deception returns us to an important question.  Are skilled athletes more or less susceptible to deception than their less skilled counterparts?

It might be predicted that the experienced athletes’ superiority in utilizing advance cues extends to their ability to detect deception in an opponent.  In this view, elite players would be less susceptible to deception and respond better to it than novices.  On the other hand, experts could be more susceptible than novices because novices draw less meaning from kinematics and so may suffer less when they are disguised or feigned.



With important implications for technical and tactical training, the impact of deception on anticipation in beach volleyball is a topic worthy of considerable attention and will further be explored in subsequent parts.

Part II will summarize the research in this area and apply it to common tactics in beach volleyball.  Part III will examine the role of motor and perceptual skill in the underlying process of detecting deception from the cues of opponents.  It is expected that greater knowledge of how anticipatory judgments are made in the sport will assist coaches to teach tactics for competitive advantage.